Products Liability

Products that are dangerous or defective result in thousands of Florida consumers to suffer death and injury every single year.

At The Ansara Law Firm, our dedicated Fort Lauderdale product liability lawyers are committed to fighting for justice on behalf of those blindsided by injury or wrongful death caused by product defects.

Consumers have the legal right to expect the goods they purchase and use are safe. Manufacturers and distributors are responsible to make sure their products meet certain safety standards before they reach the shelves. Even when products are misused, manufacturers and distributors have a responsibility to take into account reasonably foreseeable uses and either mitigate the danger or adequately warn about it.

Unfortunately, far too many businesses are all too eager to put profits ahead of the well-being of people. This isn’t unique to any one industry. The product liability attorneys at our Fort Lauderdale firm have seen this with:

When a consumer suffers injury as a result of a defective product, there may be multiple parties that could be held to account. These may include:

  • Designers
  • Manufacturers
  • Distributors
  • Suppliers
  • Retailers
  • All others who make products available to the public

In order to prevail in a product liability claim in Florida, one must first determine which theory of liability to pursue.

Theories of Product Liability in Florida

There are three main types of product liability claims in Florida. These are:

  • Negligence
  • Strict Liability
  • Breach of Warranty

In order to prevail on a theory of negligence in a product liability lawsuit, a plaintiff needs to show:

  • Manufacturer had a legal duty to design and make the product reasonably safe for use;
  • Manufacturer breached that duty;
  • Plaintiff suffered an injury that was legally caused by this breach of duty;
  • Plaintiff suffered damages.

To succeed in a product liability lawsuit on a theory of strict liability, plaintiffs have to show:

  • There was a relationship between defendant and product;
  • Product contained a defect which resulted in its being unreasonably dangerous;
  • The defect of the product caused the user to suffer harm.

Claims pursued for negligence tend to focus more heavily on the manufacturer’s duty, while strict liability claims turn the scrutiny toward the product itself. Our Fort Lauderdale product liability attorneys can advise you on which type of action may be appropriate for you.

With regard to breach of warranty, consumers need to understand there are two basic warranties on which buyers can rely upon when they purchase a product: Express and implied. An express warranty is any representation made by the manufacturer or retailer regarding the safety of the product. An implied warranty is an implied promise by the manufacturer or other liable party that the product, when used as intended, isn’t going to cause any harm. Therefore, to prove a breach of warranty claim, plaintiffs have to show:

  • An express or implied warranty existed;
  • The terms of that warranty were breached;
  • Plaintiff suffered injury as a direct result of that breach of warranty.

Although damages in a defective product case may vary, consumers generally can recover:

  • Medical bills
  • Lost wages
  • Pain and suffering
  • Mental/ emotional anguish
Who is Responsible for Defective Products?

Determining who is responsible when a product is unreasonably dangerous is not always a straightforward matter. The fact is, any party that is involved in the chain of distribution of a defective product could be held liable for resulting injuries. Including all parties in this chain is important when filing a claim with the assistance of a product liability lawyer in Fort Lauderdale. Defendants may include:

  • Manufacturer. This could involve the maker of a single part of the product or the maker of the entire product itself.
  • Retailer. Any retailer that puts a product up for sale is implying that the product is safe for public use. Therefore, retailers can be held liable if the product turns out to be unsafe. It’s important to note plaintiffs don’t necessarily have to be the one who purchased the product in order to pursue damages against the retailer.
  • Wholesaler. Otherwise known as “the middleman.”
Types of Product Defects

When filing a product liability lawsuit, plaintiffs have to be clear the type of defect they are asserting. In some cases, a product may have more than one type of defect. Usually, claims will involve at least one of the following:

  • Design Defect. This is a flaw in the original outline or design of a product that results in it being unreasonably hazardous for users. This type of flaw would be found in all of the products manufactured with this same blueprint.
  • Manufacturing Defect. This is caused by some type of mistake or flaw in the assembly of the product. Usually we’ll see this in a single batch or a small number of the company’s overall goods manufactured.
  • Failure to Warn. Manufacturers have a responsibility to warn consumers about the possible risk or provide adequate instructions that could prevent a foreseeable injury. Failure to do so will open a manufacturer to liability.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective product in South Florida, we can help.

Contact Fort Lauderdale Defective Product Attorney Richard Ansara at The Ansara Law Firm by calling (954) 761-3641.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
I have worked with Richard, a true professional and trusted source. He has shown great strength and ability to lead is his greatest asset. His office support team cultivates a culture that executes obtainable turnaround results. Thank you Ansara Law Office. Charlene Worrell
★★★★★
The man
Twice I had problems with the law and twice he took care of me. A no nonsense kind of Lawyer. If you want your problems to go away, look no further. This guy is your Lawyer. I love you Rick, thx for all your help.
Jorge
★★★★★
Great attorney and person to know. Came all the way from Fort Lauderdale to help me with a civil issue in St. Petersburg. Thank you for all your help, Rick! Celimar De Jesus
★★★★★
I would recommend Richard to anyone and I would hire him again with out hesitation. I did not know Richard Ansara. I found him on the internet. I live in another state so I had to trust. I left a message. I got a call back from Richard. He invested a lot of time just listening to what I needed him to do. It was not your traditional need. He told me what he felt he could accomplish. I liked his approach and the care he took in crafting his responses to me. I hired him. He went to work immediately. He always stayed in contact. I got progress reports from him on a regular basis. Richard completed the mission and did not overcharge me. His fee was more than fair and we got excellent results, just what we wanted. He seems to be a really good guy. That's important. A. James
★★★★★
The best lawyer I ever had. Very efficient and professional. The staff is amazing. He took care of my case very quickly and for an affordable price. Fernando Jimenez